Comments on: Toward a more robust law review process http://lawandcourts.wordpress.com/2007/12/03/toward-a-more-robust-law-review-process/ Let's get ready to rumble (but keep it clean) Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:00:57 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: prisonrodeo http://lawandcourts.wordpress.com/2007/12/03/toward-a-more-robust-law-review-process/#comment-96 prisonrodeo Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:50:36 +0000 http://lawandcourts.wordpress.com/2007/12/03/toward-a-more-robust-law-review-process/#comment-96 "A final aspect in the review process that deviates from most peer review journals, but would make the process faster, would be to do away with the `revise and resubmit' process." Actually, the journal Economic Inquiry has already done that; see (inter alia) <a href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/04/17/the-as-is-journal-review-process/" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/07/31/preston-mcafee-shakes-things-up-in-academic-publishing/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. “A final aspect in the review process that deviates from most peer review journals, but would make the process faster, would be to do away with the `revise and resubmit’ process.”

Actually, the journal Economic Inquiry has already done that; see (inter alia) here and here.

]]>