<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the Supreme Court Got It Wrong in the Massey case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawandcourts.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/why-the-supreme-court-got-it-wrong-in-the-massey-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawandcourts.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/why-the-supreme-court-got-it-wrong-in-the-massey-case/</link>
	<description>Let's get ready to rumble (but keep it clean)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:00:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Goals of Campaign Finance Law &#171; Voir Dire</title>
		<link>http://lawandcourts.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/why-the-supreme-court-got-it-wrong-in-the-massey-case/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>The Goals of Campaign Finance Law &#171; Voir Dire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawandcourts.wordpress.com/?p=1231#comment-281</guid>
		<description>[...] Corruption is a natural concern with campaign finance.  While there are clear examples (think Duke Cunningham and William Jefferson), the evidence for general corruption is limited.  A possibility of bias, however, remains (perhaps particularly important given the &#8220;probability of bias&#8221; standard invoked in the Massey case Chris Bonneau explicated earlier on Voir Dire). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Corruption is a natural concern with campaign finance.  While there are clear examples (think Duke Cunningham and William Jefferson), the evidence for general corruption is limited.  A possibility of bias, however, remains (perhaps particularly important given the &#8220;probability of bias&#8221; standard invoked in the Massey case Chris Bonneau explicated earlier on Voir Dire). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damoncann</title>
		<link>http://lawandcourts.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/why-the-supreme-court-got-it-wrong-in-the-massey-case/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>damoncann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawandcourts.wordpress.com/?p=1231#comment-274</guid>
		<description>I totally agree.. this creates a perverse incentive for  strategic contributions.  Even if businesses and groups are unwilling to contribute to someone they don&#039;t like, at a minimum, it risks eliminating attorneys and businesses as a potential source of funds for contributors.  Who would contribute if they knew they were disqualifying a friendly judge from hearing their case?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree.. this creates a perverse incentive for  strategic contributions.  Even if businesses and groups are unwilling to contribute to someone they don&#8217;t like, at a minimum, it risks eliminating attorneys and businesses as a potential source of funds for contributors.  Who would contribute if they knew they were disqualifying a friendly judge from hearing their case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavel Grab &#187; links for 2009-06-30</title>
		<link>http://lawandcourts.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/why-the-supreme-court-got-it-wrong-in-the-massey-case/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavel Grab &#187; links for 2009-06-30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawandcourts.wordpress.com/?p=1231#comment-270</guid>
		<description>[...] Why the Supreme Court Got It Wrong in the Massey case « Voir Dire   No comments  &#160;Email This Post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why the Supreme Court Got It Wrong in the Massey case « Voir Dire   No comments  &nbsp;Email This Post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
